Family Costaceae

This description is taken from Research Training Program, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PROJECT SUMMARY 1995.

Phylogenetic Relationships in the family Costaceae (Order Zingiberales)

ABSTRACT

Costaceae is a pantropical family that has four genera: Costus, Dimerocostus, Monocostus, and Tapeinochilos. Costus is the largest genus in the family (over 100 species) and distributed in the tropics around the world. Dimerocostus is a small genus with two species distributed in the neotropics. Monocostus is a monotypic genus endemic to the Rio Huallaga in Peru. Tapeinochilos is a genus with approximately 20 species distributed in New Guinea and the adjacent islands. Since it is a recently recognized family it is especially important to study the phylogenetic relationships of the genera. Cladistic analyses were executed using morphological data obtained from literature, dried specimens from the US Herbarium, pickled specimens from Dr. Kress's collection and living plants from the MSC-Greenhouses. The analyses also utilzed molecular sequences for rbcL (chloroplast DNA) and 18S rDNA (nuclear DNA) provided by Kress, Prince & Hahn (unpublished). The computer program PAUP 3.1 (Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony) was used to infer the most parsimonious phylogeny. A phylogeny for the genera in the family Costaceae is proposed based on a cladistic analysis using morphological and molecular data. The genus Tapeinochilos is place in a basal position, the genera Costus, Dimerocostus and Monocostus group together in a clade with the terminal clade formed by Dimerocostus and Monocosms. This phylogeny shows that the bilocular ovary, an important character in the classification of the genera, must have evolved twice, first in Tapeinochilos and then in the clade (Dimerocostus Monocostus). The beautifull labellum, characteristic of the family, is an undecisive character that presents polymorphy in the genus Costus and has to be studied futher to find its utility in detemuning the realtionships in the group. More study on morphological and molecular characters in the family at the species level is necessary to confirm the phylogeny proposed here.

From The Families of Flowering Plants, L. Watson and M. J. Dallwitz

Costaceae (K. Schum.) Nak.

~ Zingiberaceae

Habit and leaf form. Herbs; without essential oils. Plants succulent to non-succulent. Perennial; rhizomatous. Self supporting, or epiphytic. Mesophytic. Leaves alternate; spiral, or four-ranked; ‘herbaceous’, or fleshy; petiolate, or sessile; sheathing. Leaf sheaths with joined margins. Leaves without marked odour; simple; epulvinate. Lamina entire; lanceolate to ovate; pinnately veined (‘pinnate-parallel’); without cross-venules. Leaves conspicuously ligulate. Lamina margins entire. Vernation convolute. General anatomy. Plants with silica bodies (internal, stellate or druselike). Leaf anatomy. Epidermis without differentiation into ‘long’ and ‘short’ cells; without silica bodies. Stomata present; paracytic, or tetracytic. Guard-cells not ‘grass type’. The mesophyll without etherial oil cells; not containing mucilage cells; containing calcium oxalate crystals. The mesophyll crystals druses, or solitary-prismatic (? — no raphides). Midrib conspicuous, or not conspicuous. Minor leaf veins without phloem transfer cells (Costus, Tarpeinocheilos). Vessels absent. Stem anatomy. Cork cambium absent. Secondary thickening absent. Xylem with vessels, or without vessels. Vessel end-walls scalariform. Root anatomy. Root xylem with vessels. Vessel end-walls scalariform. Reproductive type, pollination. Plants hermaphrodite. Floral nectaries present. Nectar secretion from the gynoecium (from septal nectaries, often two well developed and one reduced). Entomophilous, or cheiropterophilous. Inflorescence, floral, fruit and seed morphology. Flowers solitary, or aggregated in ‘inflorescences’. The terminal inflorescence unit cymose. Inflorescences terminal, or axillary. Flowers bracteate (the bracts with a linear extrafloral nectary beneath the tip); bracteolate, or ebracteolate; very irregular; zygomorphic. The floral asymmetry involving the perianth and involving the androecium. Flowers basically 3 merous (but much modified); cyclic. Perigone tube absent. Perianth with distinct calyx and corolla; 6; free; 2 whorled; isomerous; different in the two whorls. Calyx 3; 1 whorled; gamosepalous; blunt-lobed; unequal but not bilabiate (spathelike, or constituting a tube split to the base on one side); imbricate; with the median member anterior. Corolla 3; 1 whorled; gamopetalous; unequal but not bilabiate (the median lobe larger and often upcurved). Androecium 1 (ostensibly), or 6 (theoretically, but scarcely recognisable as such). Androecial members free of the perianth; united with the gynoecium (in that the thin style is fused to a groove along the length of the single anther); markedly unequal; free of one another and coherent, or coherent (depending on interpretation); supposedly 2 whorled. Androecium including staminodes. Staminodes supposedly 5; petaloid. Stamens 1 (the median, posterior member of the theoretical inner whorl); reduced in number relative to the adjacent perianth; petaloid. Anthers adnate; non-versatile; dehiscing via longitudinal slits; introrse; tetrasporangiate. Anther epidermis persistent. Microsporogenesis successive. Anther wall initially with more than one middle layer. Tapetum glandular. Pollen grains aperturate; 1 aperturate, or 5–16 aperturate; sulcate, or foraminate, or spiraperturate; 2-celled. Gynoecium 3 carpelled. The pistil (1–)3 celled. Gynoecium syncarpous; eu-syncarpous; inferior. Ovary (1–)3 locular. Epigynous disk often present. Styles 1; apical. Stigmas 1; wet type; papillate; Group III type. Placentation when unilocular parietal; usually, when trilocular axile. Ovules 15–50 per locule (i.e. ‘many’); arillate; anatropous; bitegmic; crassinucellate. Outer integument not contributing to the micropyle. Embryo-sac development Adoxa-type. Polar nuclei fusing prior to fertilization. Antipodal cells not formed (the nuclei ephemeral). Synergids hooked. Hypostase present. Endosperm formation helobial. Embryogeny caryophyllad. Fruit fleshy, or non-fleshy; dehiscent, or indehiscent; a capsule, or a nut, or capsular-indehiscent, or achene-like (?— ‘a capsule, or dry and indehiscent’). Seeds endospermic. Endosperm not oily (starchy). Perisperm present. Seeds with starch. Cotyledons 1. Embryo straight. Seedling. Hypocotyl internode present (long). Seedling collar not conspicuous. Cotyledon hyperphyll compact (small); non-assimilatory (but borne atop the large, leaflike, assimilatory sheath). Coleoptile absent. First leaf dorsiventral. Primary root ephemeral. Physiology, biochemistry. Cyanogenic (Costus). Saponins/sapogenins present (Costus). Geography, cytology. Tropical. Widespread tropical. X = 8, 9. Taxonomy. Subclass Monocotyledonae. Superorder Zingiberiflorae; Zingiberales. APG (1998) Monocot; Commelinoid group; Zingiberales. Species 200. Genera 4; Costus, Dimerocostus, Monocostus, Tapeinocheilos. Cite this publication as: Watson, L., and Dallwitz, M. J. (1992 onwards). ‘The Families of Flowering Plants: Descriptions, Illustrations, Identification, and Information Retrieval.’ Version: 28th May 1999. http://biodiversity.uno.edu/delta/. Dallwitz (1980), Dallwitz, Paine and Zurcher (1993 onwards, 1995 onwards, 1998), and Watson and Dallwitz (1991) should also be cited (see References).